virtio — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
*-over-virtio
Sasha Levin <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a family of several devices that are rather simple on the virtio level. Some
> identifying features include:
>
>
* No real usage of the configuration space
>
* No device features
>
* No control vqs
>
* Usually one, but possibly 2 vqs used for straightforward message passing outside the virtio
> scope.
>
> The use case is simple: use virtio as a simple transport for protocol specific messages, this
> can pretty much go over any other transport exactly the same way.
>
> Would it make sense to move their actual definition out of the spec and just reserve device
> IDs for them there?
Do we have any in the current spec? It's certainly easy to reserve IDs
for things which aren't in the spec.
Cheers,
Rusty.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]