virtio — archive

[virtio] Groups - Ballot opened: "Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification"

From: TC Admin
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:11:00 -0000

Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification has opened. Ballot Title : Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft as a Committee Specification Question Should the TC accept changes listed in the description as non material, and Request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft with these changes as a Committee Specification? Closing Date : Wednesday, 20 August 2014 @ 11:59 pm EDT Description Please vote Yes if you agree with the following. If you disagree, please vote No. I move that: The TC accepts the following changes to the specification, to resolve issues VIRTIO-110 through VIRTIO-113: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-111 r412: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201407/msg00017.html Fix minor typos as reported in ARM's feedback. https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-112 r413: [email protected]">http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected] legacy: consistently use past tense Paragraph with general description of feature negotiation for legacy devices mixed present and past tense. As rest of legacy sections all use past tense, fix the only instance of the present tense: s/do/did/ for consistency. https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-113 r414: [email protected]">http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected] Grammar fixup: Legacy devices are they not it . https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-110 r415: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00013.html * Typos and language mistakes in 4.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2 and 4.2.2.2. * Extra clarifications for InterruptACK. r416: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00014.html Make it clear that the legacy section is non-normative, removing all MUSTs. (not in svn) https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/email/archives/201408/msg00033.html * Extra clarifications for QueueReady and ConfigGeneration * Added alignment requirement section, to formalise hidden assumptions about register accesses (not in svn) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtio.devel/522 Acknowlegde valuable input from Brian Foley. The above changes are highlighted in the following version of the document: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/download.php/53834/virtio-v1.0-os-diff.pdf You can also use the revision history chapter to locate the changes more easily. The TC resolves that the above changes are all Non-Material. The TC resolves to request a Special Majority Vote for the advancement of the draft, with the above changes, as a Committee Specification. Location of the specification with the above changes: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/virtio/download.php/53833/virtio-v1.0-os.zip This archive includes the editable Tex sources, specification in PDF and HTML formats, as well as versions with changes since CSD03 highlighted. Vote Yes No Abstain Group : OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC Date Opened : Wednesday, 13 August 2014 @ 12:00 pm EDT