virtio — archive

[PATCH] virtio-net: fix virtqueue numbering error

From: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:44:00 -0000

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:35:20 +0100 Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:51:29PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > receiveq(n) is at position 2(n-1)+1. Same error for transmitq(n) > > and controlq. > > > > VIRTIO-161 > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]> > > --- > > content.tex | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex > > index d8bde3a..2319729 100644 > > --- a/content.tex > > +++ b/content.tex > > @@ -3064,9 +3064,9 @@ features. > > \item[0] receiveq1 > > \item[1] transmitq1 > > \item[\ldots] > > -\item[2N] receiveqN > > -\item[2N+1] transmitqN > > -\item[2N+2] controlq > > +\item[2(N-1)] receiveqN > > +\item[2(N-1)+1] transmitqN > > +\item[2(N-1)+2] controlq > > There is still only one controlq overall. Therefore I suggest: > > \item[2N] controlq > > This seems clearer to me since "\item[2(N-1)+2] controlq" makes it look > like the controlq is repeated along with rx and tx queues. Indeed, that is easier to parse. Will update.