Re: [PATCH 2/5] consistency: clean up stale wording for v1.1 terms

[Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 04/10/2018 11:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon,  9 Apr 2018 20:58:39 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Occasionally we still use used and available ring instead of Device and
>> Driver Area respectively. Same goes for descriptor table with the
>> difference that depending on the context we need either Descriptor Area
>> or descriptor ring.
>>
>> Let's clean these up, at least where the cleanup is trivial.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  content.tex     |   14 +++++++-------
>>  packed-ring.tex |   10 ++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
> 
>> -\drivernormative{\subsection}{The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}
>> +\drivernormative{\subsection}{The Virtqueue Descriptor Ring}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Ring}
> 
> While you're touching it anyway: s/PAcked/Packed/ ? (Probably needs a
> change in conformance.tex as well.)
> 

Yeah, the thing with unrelated changes. Was considering it myself,
and decided not to since I'm doing basically the same change in
may places here. But I can do it next time.

Regards,
Halil