virtio — archive

[Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:15:57 -0500 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > we are adding new device types all the time. > > no point in trying to list them all in the charter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> > > --- > > charter.html 17 + ---------------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/charter.html b/charter.html > > index 38cad98..82fb981 100644 > > --- a/charter.html > > +++ b/charter.html > > @@ -80,22 +80,7 @@ > > Specification of device-specific configuration. > > <ol class="vanilla-lower-alpha"> > > <li> > > - For network devices. > > - </li> > > - <li> > > - For block storage devices. > > - </li> > > - <li> > > - For entropy devices. > > - </li> > > - <li> > > - For console devices. > > - </li> > > - <li> > > - For memory ballooning devices. > > - </li> > > - <li> > > - For SCSI endpoint devices. > > + Normative requirements for specified device types. > > </li> > > Does it make sense to keep the list with only a single element? > > > <li> > > Non-normative advice for designing new device types. > > I believe the the rest of the items starting with the one immediately > above should be moved up one level higher. These don't seem to be sub > deliverables of 'device-specific configuration' but top level > deliverables... Well if you look at the spec they are all under section 5 Device Types. The only exception is Appendix B. Creating New Device Types. I will move that one out. > Regards, > Halil