OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  virtio  ·  2023-02

virtio — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

[PATCH v10 00/10] Introduce device group and device management


On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:54:47AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > For some system calls and library functions (e.g., > > getpriority(2)), -1 is a valid return on success. In such cases, > > a successful return can be distinguished from an error return by > > setting errno to zero before the call, and then, if the call > > returns a status that indicates that an error may have occurred, > > checking to see if errno has a nonzero value. > > > > > > > > > Description is already good enough to describe what they are. > > > Can we please drop Linux wording? > > > > But why should we? It's where 22 comes from so this way people are not > > wondering about the value, and it's somewhat helpful for Linux > > developers. > > > > I also think we should not mention Linux. I don't think it's mentioned > currently in the spec and no good reason to do so now. But we do: fuse, input at least both do. > Also value of 22 is not mandatory for this EINVAL status code. It can be > just 1 (the first number after the OK status). 22 makes it a tiny bit easier for kvm. So why not. > Developers should be able to read the specification and find out the meaning > of error code. I think the text does that. -- MST

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]