[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] TC composition
At 03:13 AM 11/1/2003, [email protected] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Looking at the TC member list, I could not help but notice that there is
>not much interest from IBM.
>
>Given the fact that one of our goals here is to refine the WS-T and WS-C
>specs, this seems a bit odd... Does anybody know what their position is?
You'll have to ask IBM what their position is.
We have repeatedly invited them to participate in this open industry
standards forum so that the entire industry can come together in a forum
with well defined rules that are understood and apply to all participants
equally.
Our intent in embarking on the WS-CAF work is to unify the various extant
transaction models so that customers will have a higher certainty of
interoperability, based upon publicly developed and ratified standards.
The WS-Transactions and WS-Coordination are proprietary specifications
owned and controlled by their authors -- IBM, MS, et. al. These documents
have been made available only for "review and evaluation purposes" with the
authors retaining all IPR, patent rights, etc. (see the documents for all
the legal language).
We have encouraged the authors repeatedly, both publicly and privately, to
contribute their ideas and join this TC. So far they have chosen to pursue
their own course.
cheers,
jeff
>Best,
>Guy
Jeff Mischkinsky [email protected]
Consulting Member Technical Staff +1(650)506-1975
Director, Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]