RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion

["Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com>]

+1
abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:47 PM
> To: Marc Goodner; Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
> mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
> 
>   
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: September 8, 2005 3:31 PM
> > To: Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis
> > Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
> > 
> > I have no issue with accepting all of the proposed use 
> cases from this 
> > week's agenda and see no reason that discussion is needed 
> on the call 
> > since there has been none on the list. I think a simple motion to
> accept
> > all them should suffice.
> > 
> > However, if we are determining charter scope in order to 
> accept issues 
> > then I will need time to review each issue before discussion on the
> call
> > and propose deferring this item again until next week to do 
> so. I, and
> I
> > believe others, have not spent time reviewing these use 
> cases as they 
> > were not supposed to be evaluated for charter scope before 
> accepting 
> > them. From the original motion to handle use cases: "Initially use
> cases
> > will have an undecided scope, and the TC will vote to 
> accept use cases 
> > into the working set". I do not believe that evaluating these for 
> > charter scope during a TC call is in line with the motion 
> that the TC 
> > accepted.
> > 
> > In fact it is not clear from the motion that charter scope was ever 
> > supposed to be evaluated for these. According to another 
> other part of 
> > the proposal, "The TC will decide whether use cases are in scope or
> out
> > of scope for a given version of the specification". It is far too
> early
> > to have a discussion on this. Similar to the above I would 
> also object 
> > to discussing this on today's call. We need to progress 
> much further 
> > before any discussion of "versions" makes sense.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:28 AM
> > To: Doug Davis
> > Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > -Anish
> > --
> > 
> > Doug Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul/Gil,
> > >   Sorry for the delay, just finished reading the docs Gil 
> posted and 
> > > they all seem like valid use-cases to me (and things for the TC to
> > think
> > > about).
> > > thanks,
> > > -Doug
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>*
> > >
> > > 09/05/2005 12:03 PM
> > > Please respond to
> > > paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > 	"ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > 	[ws-rx] Use case discussion
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Folks
> > >
> > > Please remember that Sanjay asked us to initiate 
> discussion of the 
> > > proposed use cases on the email list *before* the Thursday call so
> > that
> > > the meeting time was kept to a minimum.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Fremantle
> > > Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology
> > > WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform"
> > >
> > > Yahoo IM: paulfremantle
> > > Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729
> > > Fax: +1 360 485-4275
> > > paul@wso2.com
> > >
> > >
> 
>