[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Current proposals for open issues
|
In the order they are in on the agenda, here are what I see
as the current latest proposals for open issues. Please correct me if I am
wrong so that I can get the issue list updated correctly. Note that some of the proposals below are applied in the
pending update to the issue list, rev 46, which should be online soon. i139 Inappropriate Fault destinationhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i139Now proposal 3 in issue list:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00087.html i147 Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elementshttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i147Outline of three proposals is here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00059.htmlI have added the third option in that mail to the issue list as proposal 3.Additional suggestions from Doug B. for proposal 2. (not sure this is a separate proposal, looks like an amendment)http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00079.html i140 add sub-headings to fault descriptionshttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i140The approach outlined in the issue as proposal 1 is still all I have seen on this.http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00190.html i143 messages have to be received for them to be examinedhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i143Proposal 1 in the issue list is still all I have seen.http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00200.htmli144 RMS MessageNumberRollover behavior unclearhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i144Proposal 1 in the issue list is still all I have seen.http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00212.htmli145 Implications of Sequence Expiration not specifiedhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i145
Proposal 1 in the issue list is still all I have seen.http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00216.html
122-124 i122 security profiles http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i122
i124 security composition policy http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i124
i123 security profile agreement http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i123 BEA/MSFT/IBM – now in issue list as proposal 2 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00117.html Oracle/SAP – now in issue list as proposal 3 http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00075.html Sun (Close with no action) – now in issue list as
proposal 4 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00088.html
i113 Tightening up the state tables http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i113
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200607/msg00093.html
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]