Fw: Editors instructions

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

One further thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from now.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 02/03/2006 16:08 -----
                                                                           
             Ian                                                           
             Robinson/UK/IBM                                               
                                                                        To 
             02/03/2006 16:02          wstx-editors                        
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Editors instructions                
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           



Hello Editors,

Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.

Please use the following conventions to ensure consistency:

On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name and correct form of
statustext.

1. Doc identifier value (this value should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03

2. Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case WS-TX)

4. Status.
The first line of the status section should state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a “working draft".

Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new CD.

The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed below by
spec.

WS-Coordination

Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, (18-21)

WS-AtomicTransaction

Issues: 15, 17

WS-BusinessActivity

Issues: 7, 15, 17,



Regards,
Ian