Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Completed my Edits to the spec - Pen up forGrabs

[Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>]

I finished applying the resolution to 170 - I added the text we agreed upon
for an implementer's note into Section 11.3 (first time WSDL faults are
properly introduced, right after the caveat on WSDL fault naming), plus
references to that implementer's note from sections 11.4 and 13.4.

Paco




                                                                                                                                        
                      "Satish Thatte"                                                                                                   
                      <satisht@microsof        To:       "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, "bpel spec"                      
                      t.com>                    <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>                                                 
                                               cc:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                             
                      01/27/2005 05:25         Subject:  [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Completed my Edits to the spec - Pen up for Grabs       
                      PM                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                        




Thanks Prasad.

Paco, you can go with 170 now - S.



-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:25 PM
To: bpel spec; Satish Thatte
Subject: Completed my Edits to the spec - Pen up for Grabs

Hi,

I am all done with my edits to the specification and the changes are
checked in.

The pen is now available.

Thanks.

Prasad