[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924]
Do we really want to mandate that Services may not require specific
discovery mechanisms?? I think the standard should not require specific
discovery mechanisms, but specific implementations/deployments should be
allowed to add such restrictions.
"Monica Martin"
<mmartin@certivo. To: Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
net> <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
05/08/2002 11:57 Subject: WSIA 5/8/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924]
PM
Suggest:
Services MUST be available independent of any specific discovery
mechanism.
Thanks.
Monica
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson
Sent: Mon 5/6/2002 12:19 PM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E924]
Currently:
An alternative to UDDI SHOULD be available to request a
service
description. Rewrite to be discovery-agnostic: RT.
How about:
The specification MUST be independent of any specific
discovery
mechanism.
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC