Re: WSIA 5/16/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

This sounds to me like a requirement on the Consumers, while I think the
intent is the the specifications must allow consumers these choices.



                                                                                                                    
                      "Monica Martin"                                                                               
                      <mmartin@certivo.        To:       Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,                            
                      net>                      <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>                                         
                                               cc:                                                                  
                      05/16/2002 09:15         Subject:  WSIA 5/16/2002: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]            
                      AM                                                                                            
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                    



This is what I had proposed in some rewrites sent recently:


A Consumer SHOULD be able to consume both a statefuland stateless WSIA
Web Service.



M2: Note:  I feel the mechanism is not particularly necessary unless
boundaries need to be defined by another requirement

If we need to expand on boundaries, everyone pitch in.

Thank you.
Monica J. Martin
Program Manager
Drake Certivo, Inc.
208.585.5946

             -----Original Message-----
             From: Rich Thompson
             Sent: Wed 5/15/2002 2:37 PM
             To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
             Cc:
             Subject: [wsia][wsia-requirements][R130]



             Originally:

                   A Consumer should be able to consume both a stateful
WSIA
Web Service
                   and a stateless one. If needed, this specification
should
define the
                   mechanism that allows the Consumer to support both
cases.


                   Rewrite as one simple requirement: SR, RT, MM, TC, GT.
Do
not use
                   "session", no recursive "lifecycle" definitions -
instead
"for the
                   duration of..". Allow for Consumers that consume only
stateful or
                   stateless services.





                   How about:


                   This specification MUST allow a Consumer to consume only
stateful
                   WSIA Producers, only stateless WSIA Producers or both.





                   The comment may have implied combining in R129 - 131,
but
I have no
                   clear recollection of that intent.





----------------------------------------------------------------
             To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
subscription
             manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>