[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] Issue 87: WSRF-RL -- > WSRF-SG??
Latha, my mistake. Issue WSRF87 was resolved on 10 Jan. Only WSRF-SG is
affected - WSRF-RL is not.
The resolution was:
"The response to the [SG] add [message] should include the actual
termination time and optionally the current time."
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
"Srinivasan,
Latha"
<latha.srinivasan To
@hp.com> <wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
02/02/2005 14:50
Subject
[wsrf] Issue 87: WSRF-RL -- >
WSRF-SG??
Hi,
Issue 87 is on the agenda for discussion at the F2F. The text for Issue 87
seems to indicate that it belongs to WSRF-SG. Is there something that
WSRF-RL needs to do to tighten up the semantics of "Add" that is not
captured in the Issues List?
Issue WSRF87: InitialTerminationTime in Add method needs to have stronger
guarantee
Version 1.0 of the WS-ServiceGroup specification describes the
InitialTerminationTime parameter of the Add method of the
ServiceGroupRegistration interface as: "An optional element, indicating the
requestor's suggestion for the initial setting of the termination time
resource property [WS-ResourceLifetime] of the ServiceGroupEntry
WS-Resource."
...
Thanks,
Latha
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]