[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Schema types for ScopedPropertyDescription
On page 26 of draft 12, there is some language around usage of the name
and type elements. I have some comments on the current language.
1. name: The conformance statement reads that the name "MUST have a
non-zero length. But this statement is redundant since "" is not a valid
QName.
2. type: There is a statement reading
"We would encourage these to be either from the set of schema defined
types or be explicitly ...".
This means that the following would be a valid description of a scoped
property.
<urn:transientPropertyDescriptions>
<urn:name>ns1:expiryDate</urn:name>
<urn:type>xs:dateTime</urn:type>
</urn:transientPropertyDescriptions>
To carry such a scoped property, the sender will have to construct some
xml like
<urn:transientProperty name="ns1:expiryDate">
<xs:dateTime>2005-12-31</xs:dateTime>
</urn:transientProperty>
But this is invalid since there is no such element named dateTime.
So, unless I'm mistaken, we can't make a recommendation to use schema
types. The only exception is the "xs:string" type, since strings can be
carried via the stringValue element.
BTW, the primer has such an invalid XML, and needs to be fixed.
Any comments? Am I missing something?
Subbu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]