xacml — archive

Re: [xacml] Proposed Process for Public Review

From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:29:00 -0000

This seems workable to me. -Anne On 9 October, Hal Lockhart writes: [xacml] Proposed Process for Public Review > Since we are hoping to conduct a public review, potentially starting as soon > as Monday, I propose the following process strawman. The key point is we > need a volunteer to be the review editor. My basic idea is to work comments > as they come in. I think we should be willing to make changes that: > > - correct errors and omissions > - clarify intent > - fix clearcut bugs > > we should avoid changes that: > > - add features > - create new functionality > - alter existing functionality > > > 1. Spec available on web page > 2. Public review announced in OASIS news and by special email to members and > announce lists? (whatever lists Karl suggests) > 3. document and announcements request comments to comment list > 4. review editor takes comments > 4a. breaks up multiple comment messages > 4b. posts to mail list with proposed disposition: > no action - propose explaination or clarification > correction - propose line changes > deferred - explain why > 5. Each week TC takes up and votes on dispositions > 6. At end of comment period > 6a. apply all changes > 6b. provide message back to each commentor on the disposition of their > comments > 6c. vote for committee spec of updated version > > Presumably this would be followed by the submission to OASIS. -- Anne H. Anderson Email: [email protected] Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692