xacml — archive

Re: [xacml] IsPresent semantics

From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:22:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] IsPresent semantics




From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: Simon Godik <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:20:08 -0500 (EST)







Do we need to put this description somewhere, or can we refer to it as
"QName equality"?


On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Simon Godik wrote:

> > Q: What about QName equality? See match on DataType.
>
> QName evaluates into expanded name which is a pair: (URI, local_name).
> Expanded name MUST be used in all operations involving DataType attribute of
> the xacml:AttributeDesignator,
> xacml:AttributeSelector, xacml:AttributeValue, and xacml-context:Attribute.
> Two QNames are considered equal iff URI portion of expanded names are equal,
> and local_name portions
> of the expanded names are equal.
>
> Simon
>
>