xacml — archive

Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13

From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:05:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13




From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
To: Michael McIntosh <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:08:51 -0500 (EST)








My appologies for not making the concall this morning. Unforunately, I got
detained at the doctor's office this morning.

> Seth: Status Issue - want to be able to specify attribute without value.
> Anne: Already accepted this.
> Hal: Want to have two definitions (one where value is required and one
> where it isn't)

This is the case where you need to specify the attribute in the return
status as missing. Correct?

As part of the input context, every <Attribute> MUST have a value,
otherise, the "mustBePresent" semantics breaks down. We should probably
have a new element that specifies it as a missing attribute specification
as part of the output context not to get it mixed up with the <Attribute>
element.

Is that the way its going?

BTW, I leave for England tomorrow for a week, so I will not be at the next
concall.

Cheers,
-Polar






Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13
From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>



References:

Draft Minutes - November 13
From: Michael McIntosh <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]