[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposed Agenda for 12 August 2010 TC Meeting
Proposed Agenda for 12 August 2010 TC Meeting:
13:00 - 13:05
Roll Call & Approve Minutes:
Roll Call:
Approve Minutes:
29 July 2010 TC Meeting:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201007/msg00043.html
13:05-13:10
Administrivia:
OASIS IDtrust Member Section Steering Committee Elections Now Open:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201008/msg00003.html
13:10-14:00
XACML v3 Status:
Ballot results:
7 specs were approved by 11-0 of 12 eligible votes being yes
xacml/saml approved by 10-0 of 12 eligible votes being yes
Next steps:
All 8 specs are CS, presumably next step is advance to OASIS Standard.
Export and IPC specs:
TC-admin issues raised:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201008/msg00000.html
TC-admin issues responded to:
TC-admin 186: (Export Control - U.S. (EC-US)
(xacml-3.0-ec-us-v1-spec-cd-03-en.doc) uploaded)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201008/msg00002.html
TC-admin 187: (Intellectual Property Control profile - doc
(xacml-3.0-ipc-v1-spec-cd-02-en.doc) uploaded)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201008/msg00001.html
New Issues:
xacml-users: problem w 2.0 hierarchical profile
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-users/201008/msg00008.html
User is asking why:
"'3.1 Nodes in an XML document' requiring that not only
should one include a resource-id of type xpath-expression for the node
that is the resource for the access decision but also its parent and
all ancestors. Why is this required by the spec? Why is it necessary."
This should already be addressed in 3.0 hier profile;
should we consider updating the 2.0 hier profile w errata?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]