[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes 20 February 2014 TC meeting
Minutes for 20 February 2014 TC meeting
I. Roll Call & Approve Minutes
Voting Members:
Hal Lockhart (chair)
Bill Parducci (chair)
Crystal Hayes
Richard Hill
Mohammad Jafari
Steven Legg
Rich Levinson
Erik Rissanen
Remon Sinnema
John Tolbert
Members:
Martin Smith (Observer)
Quorum Achieved - 100% (per Oasis)
Minutes 6 February 2014 TC Meeting
APPROVED unanimously
II. Adminstrivia
Process proposal
Hal: suggest that we carry on the meeting, formally adjourn, then
discuss interoperability issues. Meeting notes for this will
be posted separately from these minutes.
The TC concurs with approach.
Mohammad: There is been renewed interest in a new architecture for
the Obligation Profile. I would like to present this in a
future meeting.
Multi Profile reference errors
Hal: mechanical errors we discussed on the list.
Erik: I will continue to validate the remainder of the document
references as I edit the Profiles.
Data Aggregation RFI
Hal briefly reviewed the RFI notification
MAP Profile TAB Comments response uploaded
Richard: I don't believe I updated the versioning correctly. What
is the the correct versioning?
Hal: It needs to be Working Draft "n+1".
Richard: I don't believe that there substantiative with the changes.
Hal: Based upon the review of the TC it can be voted on to
appropriate level.
Richard: I will repost with correct version.
SAML Profile WD-17 uploaded
Erik: This Profile was not a CS. This work is based upon a Working
Draft so it must proceed through the full cycle
Hal: Has this been reviewed? Should we vote for CSD?
Erik: I would like to perform the final review on references to
make sure everything is correct.
Profile process
John: Can we decide as TC when we want to move ahead with the
collection of Profiles we have?
Hal: We have been waiting on a few that have been in process.
Erik: I will contact David Brossard to get an update on his work.
III. Issues
XACML double data-type
Hal: reviewed the issue at a high level and noted that his research
showed that the IEEE references need to be updated and that
this will require some modifications. This is not an issue
related to javascript. I may enter something into an errata
and/or wiki addressing this.
Nested/related entity Profile question
Rich: reviewed his question and understanding of the Profile. Noting
that Steven confirmed his understanding and that he would like
to review it in a bit a more detail.
Steven: It really boils down to how will the problem maps to a tree
structure. Trees can be mapped onto a nested model, but it
is not recommended.
meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]