[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-65) Change Tracking Module/Extension
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Filip updated XLIFF-65:
-----------------------------
Labels: editorial request_tc_discussion (was: editorial request_tc_discussion work_required)
> Change Tracking Module/Extension
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: XLIFF-65
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-65
> Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ITS Module
> Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04
> Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/v726jty4uancxepi
> Reporter: Yves Savourel
> Assignee: David Filip
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: editorial, request_tc_discussion
> Fix For: 2.1_cs01
>
>
> A few notes:
> In section "5.9.5 ITS Tools Referencing", in the warning, we point to "5.6
> Change Tracking Extension (Informative)", but the text in
> the referring text says "Change Tracking Module".
> Also the warning includes the text ".possibly extended with ITS Module
> Provenance metadata." But there is no reference to Provenance
> in CTR, including in the schema.
> Also, the section "5 The Modules Specifications" has now an informative "5.6
> Change Tracking Extension (Informative)" section. It
> look strange to have an extension defined in the specification. Should it be in
> an appendix?
> And finally the top paragraph of the section "5.6 Change Tracking Extension
> (Informative)" says ".replace it with a revised Change
> Tracking Module hopefully for XLIFF Version 2.2."
> I think we should drop "hopefully for XLIFF Version 2.2." as no expectations
> should be set.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]