[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-67) LQI comment vs Localization Note

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-67?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=66970#comment-66970 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-67:
----------------------------------

The proposed resolution has been printed as cs01 candidate dated 01 August 2017.
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.pdf

Hereby a Call for Dissent is made.

If no dissent is recorded by Saturday August 5, 2017 23:59 PDT, as a comment on this issue or as an email to the XLIFF mailing list xliff@lists.oasis-open.org referencing this Issue, the currently applied disposition will be deemed approved by consensus of the TC.

> LQI comment vs Localization Note
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-67
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-67
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: other
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/37xmhk3zbon3i7w3
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: David Filip
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: CFD, editorial
>             Fix For: 2.1_cs01
>
>
> In "5.9.6.4 Localization Quality Issue" there is a note saying:
> "If human reviewers or other QA agents (Enriching Agents from the XLIFF
> specification point of view), need to insert general
> comments pertaining to whole structural elements such as paragraphs, sections,
> or files rather than to specific inline portions of
> source or target content, the Localization Note data category is more suitable."
> I'm not sure this is wise. I would expect a QA agent to use the LQI data
> category, not the Localization Note data category.
> Maybe we should say nothing instead of hinting at other ways to do thing?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)