[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-68) conformance clarification

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=67050#comment-67050 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-68:
----------------------------------

There has been no discussion for a while

The proposed resolution (won't fix) has been printed as cs01 candidate dated 01 August 2017. 
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.pdf 

Hereby a Call for Dissent is made. 

If no dissent is recorded by Saturday August 11, 2017 23:59 PDT, as a comment on this issue or as an email to the XLIFF mailing list xliff@lists.oasis-open.org referencing this Issue, the currently applied disposition will be deemed approved by consensus of the TC.

> conformance clarification
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-68
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-68
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jsdjodzfaym76kqz
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: David Filip
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: CFD, editorial
>             Fix For: 2.1_cs01
>
>
> In "5.9.4 Conformance to the ITS Module Specification" it says:
> "Conformant Agents MUST be XLIFF Conformant in the sense of XLIFF Application
> Conformance and also implement at least one [ITS] data
> category defined in the section 'ITS data categories defined in the ITS Module'
> of this ITS Module or provide full support for at
> least one of the [ITS] custom annotations (ITS Mapping Annotations) specified in
> the Section 'ITS data categories that have a
> partial overlap with XLIFF features'."
> In .the Section 'ITS data categories. "section" should be lowercase.
> Why is the second part 'restricted' to annotations? It would be simpler and more
> correct to say:
> "Conformant Agents MUST be XLIFF Conformant in the sense of XLIFF Application
> Conformance and also implement at least one [ITS] data
> category defined in the section 'ITS data categories defined in the ITS Module'
> or in the section 'ITS data categories that have a
> partial overlap with XLIFF features'."
> The current text makes it sound like it would be OK to support only the
> annotation part of a data category.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)