RE: [xri] subject sets (also sort of: Agenda for August 6, 2009call)

[Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>]

I think having a trust section will just confuse. The intro to the signature section should explain what they are for and establishing trust (with a simple example) is an obvious use case.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Norris [mailto:will@willnorris.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:43 PM
> To: XRI TC
> Subject: Re: [xri] subject sets (also sort of: Agenda for August 6,
> 2009 call)
> 
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
> 
> > Looks like I did not attache it properly...
> >
> > Here it is.
> 
> 
> I included these changes in the commits I made a few earlier today.
> The one thing you have that I hadn't included was keeping the "XRD
> Trust" section (included below), pointing to work needing to be done
> by profiles.  I'm not sure if it's common practice to explicitly point
> out the fact that this needs to be done in later profiles, or if that
> is implied by the absence of any trust section, which is sufficient.
> 
> -will
> 
> 
> 
> > <section id="s.section.trust">
> > 	<title>XRD Trust</title>
> > 	<para>
> > 		Combining the digital signature capability and XRD
> processing,
> > 		XRD can be used to establish Trust within application in
> various
> > ways.
> > 		The Trust is application specific and needs to be specified
> in
> > profiles
> > 		for each applications.   {TODO: finish this}
> > 	</para>
> >
> > </section>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php