| 00000 |
ISSUE-118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> -proposal v4 |
David Booz
|
2009-07-01 19:22 |
| 00001 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution |
David Booz
|
2009-07-01 20:02 |
| 00002 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-02 10:15 |
| 00003 |
Conversion rules for property values are not specified |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-02 10:23 |
| 00004 |
NEW ISSUE: Conversion rules for property values are not specified |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-02 10:24 |
| 00005 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution |
David Booz
|
2009-07-02 11:29 |
| 00006 |
ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are not specified |
David Booz
|
2009-07-02 12:28 |
| 00007 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are notspecified |
David Booz
|
2009-07-02 13:03 |
| 00008 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-02 13:38 |
| 00009 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-168: Conversion rules for property values are notspecified |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-02 14:45 |
| 00010 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-06-29 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-06-29.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-05 19:20 |
| 00011 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-05 19:48 |
| 00012 |
JAVA-139: Update to proposed changes to JavaCAA |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-05 21:41 |
| 00013 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-05 21:45 |
| 00014 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-06 08:25 |
| 00015 |
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Accessing SCA Services from non-SCA component code - Updated Proposal |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-07-06 13:23 |
| 00016 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-06 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-06.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-07 08:03 |
| 00017 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-09 14:35 |
| 00018 |
Fw: PDF line number changes |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-09 19:15 |
| 00019 |
Raw minutes for 10 July |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-10 14:51 |
| 00020 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-10 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-10.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-12 21:27 |
| 00021 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-12 21:32 |
| 00022 |
Groups - Issue 164 Proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01+Issue164b.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-13 09:19 |
| 00026 |
Groups - Issue 58 Proposal - Word (sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58e.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-13 09:37 |
| 00027 |
[ISSUE 58] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normativedefinition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Applicationcontext - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-13 09:41 |
| 00028 |
Java TC raw minutes July 13th 2009 |
Graham Charters
|
2009-07-13 16:05 |
| 00029 |
Interesting PR comment |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-15 19:08 |
| 00030 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Interesting PR comment |
David Booz
|
2009-07-15 19:14 |
| 00031 |
A New SCA Testing TC? |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-07-15 20:43 |
| 00032 |
RE: [sca-bindings] A New SCA Testing TC? |
Patil, Sanjay
|
2009-07-15 21:11 |
| 00033 |
Review comments on Java CAA TA Document |
David Booz
|
2009-07-16 13:14 |
| 00034 |
Re: [sca-j] Review comments on Java CAA TA Document |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-16 14:31 |
| 00035 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-13 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-13.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-16 14:57 |
| 00036 |
Re: [sca-j] Review comments on Java CAA TA Document |
David Booz
|
2009-07-16 14:59 |
| 00037 |
[SCA-J] Current open issue status |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-07-16 18:24 |
| 00038 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-16 18:25 |
| 00039 |
Re: [sca-policy] A New SCA Testing TC? |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-07-16 23:42 |
| 00040 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Re: [sca-policy] A New SCA Testing TC? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-07-17 00:19 |
| 00041 |
[ISSUE 59] SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens whena Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces - UPDATEDPROPOSAL |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-17 08:34 |
| 00043 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-17 09:13 |
| 00044 |
RE: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-07-17 09:18 |
| 00045 |
Raw Text Meeting Minutes - TC meeting of 17th July 2009 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-17 15:22 |
| 00046 |
Re: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-17 21:11 |
| 00047 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-19 11:01 |
| 00048 |
Groups - SCA Spring WD02 - Word (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-20 13:44 |
| 00049 |
Groups - SCA Spring WD02 - PDF (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-20 13:44 |
| 00050 |
SCA Spring WD02 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-20 13:47 |
| 00051 |
Groups - SCA EJB Binding WD 04 (doc) (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-20 13:47 |
| 00052 |
EJB Binding WD 04 - latest issues applied |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 14:08 |
| 00053 |
NEW ISSUE: EJB Binding spec needs a conformance section |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 14:19 |
| 00054 |
NEW ISSUE: Description of bindingType for EJB binding is missing from spec |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 14:25 |
| 00055 |
ISSUE-169: EJB Binding spec needs a conformance section |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 14:31 |
| 00056 |
ISSUE-170: Description of bindingType for EJB binding is missing from spec |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 15:48 |
| 00057 |
[sca-j] Java TC July 20th minutes(raw) |
Xang Mei
|
2009-07-20 16:18 |
| 00058 |
NEW ISSUE: Duplicate normative statements in Java CI and Java CAA |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 20:05 |
| 00059 |
NEW ISSUE: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords |
David Booz
|
2009-07-20 20:05 |
| 00061 |
NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should mention how implicitservices should be determined for special bean definitions |
Ramkumar R1
|
2009-07-21 12:24 |
| 00062 |
ISSUE-171: Duplicate normative statements in Java CI and Java CAA |
David Booz
|
2009-07-21 12:52 |
| 00063 |
ISSUE-172: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords |
David Booz
|
2009-07-21 12:52 |
| 00064 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Java CAA spec - Incorrect use of RFC2119 keywords |
David Booz
|
2009-07-21 13:02 |
| 00065 |
ISSUE-173: SCA Spring C & I specification should mention how implicitservices should be determined for special bean definitions |
David Booz
|
2009-07-21 13:05 |
| 00066 |
LOA request |
David Booz
|
2009-07-22 13:25 |
| 00067 |
Groups - EJB Binding Issue 107 proposal (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v1.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-22 14:12 |
| 00068 |
Groups - EJB Binding Issue 107 proposal (doc) (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v1.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-22 14:13 |
| 00069 |
ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification -proposal v1 |
David Booz
|
2009-07-22 14:23 |
| 00070 |
LOA request |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-22 14:24 |
| 00071 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-17 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-17.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-23 12:46 |
| 00072 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-20 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-20.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-23 12:47 |
| 00073 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-23 13:25 |
| 00074 |
NEW ISSUE: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification |
David Booz
|
2009-07-23 18:30 |
| 00075 |
ISSUE-174: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification |
David Booz
|
2009-07-23 18:34 |
| 00076 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v1 |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-07-24 05:58 |
| 00081 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-24 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-24.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-26 18:32 |
| 00082 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-26 18:38 |
| 00083 |
[sca-j] [JAVA-150] SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCAruntime should load multiple application context files. |
Ramkumar R1
|
2009-07-27 06:59 |
| 00084 |
NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should use "id" of the bean touniquely identify a bean instead of its name |
Ramkumar R1
|
2009-07-27 07:23 |
| 00085 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v2 - REVIEW |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-27 09:22 |
| 00086 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: SCA Spring C & I specification should use "id" of the bean to uniquely identify a bean instead of its name [JAVA-175] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-07-27 10:40 |
| 00087 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-27 12:56 |
| 00088 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-27 12:58 |
| 00089 |
[ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&I Specification -Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-27 13:00 |
| 00090 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Proposal |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-07-27 14:18 |
| 00091 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-27 14:39 |
| 00092 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-27 14:40 |
| 00093 |
Today's chat log |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-27 15:53 |
| 00094 |
Groups - Java CAA Test Assertions - PDF Format (SCA_J_CAA_Test_Assertions_6.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-28 10:32 |
| 00096 |
Updated Test Assertions Document for Java CAA |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-28 10:36 |
| 00097 |
Groups - SCA EJB Binding Issue 107 (RFC2119) doc (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-29 15:23 |
| 00098 |
Groups - SCA EJB Binding Issue 107 (RFC2119) pdf (sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-04+issue107_v3.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-29 15:23 |
| 00099 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v2.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-29 15:42 |
| 00100 |
ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification -proposal v3 |
David Booz
|
2009-07-29 15:43 |
| 00101 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v2.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-29 15:44 |
| 00103 |
Apologies for this Friday's meeting |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-29 15:49 |
| 00104 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal |
David Booz
|
2009-07-29 18:17 |
| 00105 |
Re: [sca-j] Apologies for this Friday's meeting |
Simon Nash
|
2009-07-30 05:43 |
| 00106 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - PDF format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v3.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-30 09:22 |
| 00107 |
Groups - Issue 106 proposal - Word format (sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD02+Issue106v3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-30 09:23 |
| 00108 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-30 09:24 |
| 00109 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v3 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-07-30 10:01 |
| 00110 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&ISpecification - Updated Proposal |
David Booz
|
2009-07-30 12:44 |
| 00111 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB BindingSpecification - proposal v3 |
David Booz
|
2009-07-30 14:54 |
| 00112 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-27 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-07-27.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-30 18:57 |
| 00113 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-30 19:02 |
| 00114 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-07-31 07:45 |
| 00115 |
Re: [sca-j] Apologies for this Friday's meeting |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-07-31 09:43 |
| 00116 |
Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31st July)? |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-07-31 10:08 |
| 00117 |
Re: [sca-j] Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31stJuly)? |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-07-31 10:37 |
| 00118 |
Re: [sca-j] Considering cancelling SCA-J call today (Friday 31st July)? |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-07-31 12:54 |
| 00120 |
[sca-j] Java TC July 20th minutes(raw) |
Xang Mei
|
2009-07-31 15:18 |
