| 00001 |
RE: [ws-rx] RE: WS-RX F2F Meeting venue, Jun 23-24 |
"Oaul Dotton"
|
2005-06-03 11:48 |
| 00014 |
my presentation charts |
Dhristopher C Gerris
|
2005-06-23 16:21 |
| 00018 |
Bridge closed for lunch --resume around 1:15 PDT |
Keff [ischkinsky
|
2005-06-23 19:06 |
| 00022 |
Microsoft WS-RM and WS-RMPolicy contribution to WS-RX TC |
"Oaul Dotton"
|
2005-06-23 21:47 |
| 00024 |
TIBCO WS-RM and WS-RMPolicy contribution to WS-RX [email protected] |
Rhivajee Ramdarshi
|
2005-06-23 21:57 |
| 00046 |
RE: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finer granularitythan Port Type |
Christopher B Ferris
|
2005-06-28 12:20 |
| 00050 |
Re: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finergranularity than Port Type |
Doug Bunting
|
2005-06-28 17:39 |
| 00051 |
RE: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finer granularity than Port Type |
Abbie Barbir
|
2005-06-28 18:14 |
| 00052 |
Separation of Sender and Receiver Qos Assertions |
Tom Rutt
|
2005-06-28 18:26 |
| 00053 |
How does Receiver Endpoint assert Reliability QOS per Operation |
Tom Rutt
|
2005-06-28 18:41 |
| 00054 |
Re: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finer granularitythan Port Type |
Paul Fremantle
|
2005-06-28 18:49 |
| 00055 |
Is there a requirement for the Sending Endpoint to assert ReliabilityQos level for a Sequence |
Tom Rutt
|
2005-06-28 18:51 |
| 00059 |
Re: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finer granularitythan Port Type |
Tom Rutt
|
2005-06-28 19:48 |
| 00062 |
Re: [ws-rx] How does Receiver Endpoint assert Reliability QOS perOperation |
Tom Rutt
|
2005-06-28 21:28 |
| 00063 |
Re: [ws-rx] Use Case for having Reliability assurances at finer granularity than Port Type |
Jeff Mischkinsky
|
2005-06-28 21:31 |
