xri

← back

23 messages · 5 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 RE: [xri] updated proposed XRI 1.1 ABNF Drummond Reed 2004-10-04 22:51
00001 RE: [xri] updated proposed XRI 1.1 ABNF Dave McAlpin 2004-10-04 22:56
00002 RE: [xri] updated proposed XRI 1.1 ABNF Drummond Reed 2004-10-04 23:30
00003 RE: [xri] updated proposed XRI 1.1 ABNF Dave McAlpin 2004-10-04 23:37
00004 RE: [xri] updated proposed XRI 1.1 ABNF Drummond Reed 2004-10-05 04:31
00005 Alternative XRI 1.1 path Drummond Reed 2004-10-05 06:41
00006 RE: [xri] Alternative XRI 1.1 path Drummond Reed 2004-10-05 06:49
00007 Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Drummond Reed 2004-10-15 01:23
00009 (no subject) Snknown 2004-10-22 15:00
00008 Re: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Lindelsee, Mike 2004-10-22 18:51
00010 RE: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Wachob, Gabe 2004-10-26 22:14
00012 (no subject) Snknown 2004-10-27 21:00
00011 RE: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Dave McAlpin 2004-10-28 00:16
00013 RE: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Wachob, Gabe 2004-10-28 17:17
00014 XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Wachob, Gabe 2004-10-28 18:13
00015 RE: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Dave McAlpin 2004-10-29 13:54
00016 RE: [xri] Stable XRI 1.1 ABNF Dave McAlpin 2004-10-29 14:00
00017 Re: [xri] XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Davis, Peter 2004-10-29 14:44
00018 [Fwd: W3C is developing SPARQL Re: RDF Path?] Davis, Peter 2004-10-29 18:05
00019 RE: [xri] XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Wachob, Gabe 2004-10-29 18:07
00020 RE: [xri] XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Davis, Peter 2004-10-29 18:32
00021 RE: [xri] XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Wachob, Gabe 2004-10-29 18:42
00022 RE: [xri] XRIDescriptor/Expires... maybe a TTL instead? Davis, Peter 2004-10-29 19:05