[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Carol, Where is the spreadsheet? I don't see
it.
I really like all these suggestions for seeding the focus
discussions. I think the spec and the language ref would be great starter
content. We could definitely ask people to submit example code blocks.
Adding comments would be fine for the KB pages. I'd like to see what someone
might suggest for the list of topic-based authoring books that I just
added.
Carol, Can you get my blog renamed? How about TopicsRUs by
JoAnn Hackos or is that too silly?
JoAnn
WRT Bruce's message, I did turn Drupal's comment feature
back on, so at the bottom of every page, there's an "add comment" link.
Editorial Board members could periodically review any comments posted and make
decisions about incorporating them into the main text of the
page.
Note also that I've edited the footer for the site. Now we
have links to the KB, Today, and Wiki overview pages with instructions for
adding content to each. Please let me know if you think this
works.
WRT Michael's message, I'll have to check with Mary
McRae.
--carol
Along
these lines, I was thinking of defining shadow pages for some of the
architecture pages, so that people could comment, and then the comments could be
edited into the architecture pages.
This
would help a lot with keeping up with abstracts of articles, for
example.
Bruce
It just occurred to
me that one way to kickstart/focus discussion in the community area would be
to provide the existing DITA 1.0 spec as a set of starter topics, which people
can then comment on, respond to, etc. - effectively letting the community
annotate the spec.
How hard would
this be, and would it be ok/appropriate from an OASIS point of view? I'm not
suggesting this as a prereq for launch, but thinking it could be a useful
follow-on activity.
Michael
Priestley
IBM DITA Architect
Classification Schema PDT
Lead
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
|
