Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Len Bullard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Gavin Nicol <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:37:05 -0600
Gavin Nicol wrote:
> >Perhaps to start the ball rolling, I'll ask if anyone has used Lark or NXP
> >(Java-based). I've used both. What are you looking for in Parsers? Is the
> >API that Lark and NXP offer reasonable? Would you want to build in sgmls,
> >SP, sgmlc, etc.?
> I think that we should define a common parser API.
Second that. The lack of this and a *standard* way to define
the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and
grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)