[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: gtn@ebt.com (Gavin Nicol)
- To: cbullard@hiwaay.net
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:59:45 -0500
>Second that. The lack of this and a *standard* way to define
>the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and
>grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
>A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a
>development list.
Quite. I think we can model these objects in a number of ways
though. I would personally like to define the objects in IDL
*and* SGML... (for information on IDL etc. look at www.omg.org).
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
