[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: gtn@ebt.com (Gavin Nicol)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:08:17 -0500
>>I think that for the *parser*, we should define an event-handling
>>interface, as it is much simpler to build certain applications
>>that way, and because you can build a tree from a stream of
>>events if you need to.
>
>yes. Actually, it might be best to define an event interface (similar to
>SP?) first, and then define a grove interface. In terms if
>test-implimentations, that means we could build an general event->grove
>module which could be used on any (conforming) event generating parser
Yes. It is also possible to validate the *parser* implementation based
soley upon the event-stream.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
