Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Gavin Nicol)
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:18:41 -0500
>I am not convinced that it is really worth implimenting groves this way
>though. Groves are designed such that it is often easier to duplicate
>information, in a slightly different form, than to just reference it.
>Sometimes you have to.
Quite right. My implementation is actually different, though
conceptually like the model I demonstrated.
>When I was working on a general Grove interface I came to decide that
>it really should be a grove specific set of classes which build on
>some more primitive interfaces (such as node, property_value), and
>which impliment properties as methods.
Yes. Properties as methods is a much better idea. In my actual
implementation, I basically export a map interface that allows
properties to be set/get by name, and have various flavors of
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)