[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "ksaito@flab.fujitsu.co.jp" <ksaito@flab.fujitsu.co.jp>
- To: lee@sq.com
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:16:09 +0900
lee@sq.com wrote...
>I did not mean to imply that NOTATION was not a good thing to use
>in conjunction with an entity in SGML.
I'm sorry, I missunderstood your previous mail.
>I wanted to point out that it is used for two different purposes.
>First, it is used to identify the type of the entity.
>Second, it is often used to specify how to process the entity.
My idea is uses NOTATION as second purpose.
>In any case, I would not expect an arbitrary style sheet to be
>referred to as an SGML entity unless, as in James' example, you
>want to refer to it explicitly in a document.
No no, I don't want to refer in document. I want to refer from DTD.
Many of DSSSL style-sheet will be depend on DTD, I think. I want to
put style-sheet entity declearation on DTD.
>A style sheet is not normally part of the actual document itself.
About well-formed XML document which has no DTD, it is not so bad
that such document has style-sheet or pointer to style-sheet for
portability, I think.
>If yuo want to link from a document to style sheet, you could
>reasonably (I think) use processing instructions.
I think PI is not good solution. When I write style-sheet as PI,
I can only one style-sheet type. And since PI has no attribute or
notation, application can't recognize notaion of PI.
---------------------------------------------
KAZUMI Saito
Fujitsu Labotatories Ltd. ISA Lab.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
