Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:36:19 -0700
At 10:09 AM 18/06/97 -0700, David Schach wrote:
>This kind of bug will be common because SGML allows the & to be used
>this way. I think this difference in entity processing unnecessarily
>complicates SGML to XML conversion.
Yes, this kind of bug will be common. The chance of changing this
in XMl-lang is very small. One of the bogosities that make SGML parsers
hard to write is that entity references are nontrivial to recognize. When
I'm teaching XMl, it's *so nice* to be able to say: all markup without
exception starts with '<' or '&', and anything that starts with
'<' or '&', without exception, is markup. End of story. Users like it,
programmers like it.
So, what's the solution? If all else fails, a postprocessor that
takes <a href="/cgi-bin/frobnisticate?a1=mona;a2=lisa;a3=overdrive">
and changes the ;'s to &'s on the way off to the server?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)