[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: jtigue@datachannel.com (John Tigue)
- To: "Peter S. Housel" <housel@ms7.hinet.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 14:31:43 -0700
Peter S. Housel wrote:
> I'm considering starting work on an XML parser (written in Dylan)
> , but
> I was waiting to see what sort of consensus the XAPI discussions would
>
> come to.
There doesn't seem to be much disagreement on XAPI-J 1.0, probably
because there isn't much to it; so far it's really just elements,
attributes, and events (the events are not done yet). Before going
forward I think it would be good to see some implementations of XAPI-J
other than DataChannel's.
XAPI-J is limited to Java. You might be more interested in the work of
the DOM which is language independent and much more encompassing than
XAPI-J 1.0. This work is limited in scope compared to the grove work of
DSSSL. The goal of XAPI-J 1.0 is to simply come up with common method
signatures for those methods which are present in the existing
processors. This allows for implementation independence for the
processor consumer.
--
John Tigue
Programmer
jtigue@datachannel.com
DataChannel (http://www.datachannel.com)
206-462-1999
begin: vcard
fn: John Tigue
n: Tigue;John
org: Datachannel
adr: 10020 Main St.;;#205;Bellevue;WA;98004;USA
email;internet: jtigue@datachannel.com
tel;work: 462-1999
tel;home: 498-4708
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
end: vcard
|
