[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Eric Baatz - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS <ebaatz@barbaresco.East.Sun.COM>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:45:30 -0400 (EDT)
I don't understand why such a wide choice of characters are allowed in
in the June XML Syntax specification.
[7] Nmtoken ::= (NameChar)+
Because
[4] NameChar ::= Letter | Digit | MiscName
[3] MiscName ::= '.' | '-' | '_' | ':' | CombiningChar | Ignorable | Extender
[87] Ignorable ::= a whole bunch of characters like "zero width non-joiner",
"right-to-left mark", and "zero width no-break space"
This seems to allow Nmtokens that aren't visible to the human eye,
for example, consisting of a single zero width non-joiner.
My limited understanding of SGML suggests that a Nmtoken is more like
a Name rather than a superset of it. For that matter, is "9" a sensible
Nmtoken?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|