Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: james anderson too <email@example.com>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 14:01:43 +0100
why do inline declarations need an additional operator? what's wrong with
allowing element - or, in a similar sense, entity declarations - to appear with
their standard syntax?
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> > From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@JetForm.com>
> > (1) Declarations must be performed near the top of the file.
> > (2) Declarations should be performed near where they are used.
> There has been a proposal for inline declarations recently. They would
> use declaration syntax but be inside a processing instruction, e.g.
> <?IS8879 ELEMENT dog (nose, leg+, tail) ?>
> (This, I believe, will not be in WebSGML, now being finalized. But it
> may make it through the big SGML revision which looms.)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)