[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: james anderson too <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>, "xml-dev@ic.ac.uk" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 14:01:43 +0100
why do inline declarations need an additional operator? what's wrong with
allowing element - or, in a similar sense, entity declarations - to appear with
their standard syntax?
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> > From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@JetForm.com>
>
> > (1) Declarations must be performed near the top of the file.
> > (2) Declarations should be performed near where they are used.
>
> There has been a proposal for inline declarations recently. They would
> use declaration syntax but be inside a processing instruction, e.g.
> <?IS8879 ELEMENT dog (nose, leg+, tail) ?>
>
> (This, I believe, will not be in WebSGML, now being finalized. But it
> may make it through the big SGML revision which looms.)
>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
