[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- To: "james anderson too" <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 02:43:50 +1100
> From: james anderson too <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>
> why do inline declarations need an additional operator? what's wrong with
> allowing element - or, in a similar sense, entity declarations - to appear with
> their standard syntax?
That all has to be discussed. (I really shouldnt have mentioned that, I find
it confusing enough trying to keep up with the latest XML draft, let alone
all the suggestions being considered for SGML! There is a big back catalog of
changes that WG4 has approved for the revision. The ones with a specific
correlation to XML have been expedited for WebSGML [the update to SGML]
so that XML and SGML will be in synch.)
Rick Jelliffe
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
