Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: James Clark <email@example.com>
- To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 17:54:39 +0700
james anderson too wrote:
> do i understand the (PR-xml-971208) document correctly, that it is
> possible, by means of distinct document type declarations, to refer to
> different aspects of a document type definition?
> according to
>  extSubset ::= ( markupdecl | conditionalSect | PEReference
> | S )
> there is no requirement that the external subset begin with a document
> type declaration.
It is a requirement that the external subset *not* begin with a document
> which would mean that the only indication of the root element type comes
> from the refering declaration. which would mean that distinct xml
> documents could well specify different root elements with respect to the
> same external subset.
> is this intentional?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)