[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- To: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>, james anderson <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:35:45 GMT
> No, it's not SGML's fault, at least not this time. Conforming SGML
> parsers are allowed to continue processing if they want to, and are
> even allowed not to report errors at all (as long as they don't claim
> to be "validating parsers"). XML has gone way beyond any SGML
> requirements with this one.
Always remember that your software doesn't have to be a conforming
XML processor unless you want it to be. There are several applications
where you certainly *don't* want to be a conforming processor, such as
an XML editor.
-- Richard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
