[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 11:53:11 -0500
Gavin Nicol writes:
> >If we omit comments, then SAX-J would have to return only the
> >following information:
> >
> >- elements
> >- attributes
> >- PIs
> >- texts
>
> I would recommend that you also leave in comments. That would allow
> you to build a DOM representation, and write it out again such that
> it would be very close to the original.
My guess is that the level-one DOM includes comments only to support
messed-up HTML-related tools that hide what should be processing
instructions in comments. I don't know if we really want to dirty
ourselves with this in XML, unless we can come up with a compelling
reason.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@microstar.com
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- References:
- RE: IDL?
- From: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>
|