[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 10:14:34 -0800
At 09:57 AM 01/01/98 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>What the PR means to say here is that a DTD-driven XML parser has to
>treat whitespace in element content differently than whitespace in
>mixed content -- this, of course, has nothing to do with xml:space.
>If there is no DTD, then all element types are assumed to allow mixed
>content, so a DTD-driven XML parser ("validating XML processor") would
>report all whitespace as significant.
>
>What should SAX do with ignorable whitespace?
SAX must pass all whitespace in the document, without exception,
through to the application. This is the only remotely conformant
behavior. The mark-insignificant-WS stuff only is possible in
the case you're validating, and users of SAX surely do not expect
a validating-processor underneath. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
