Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <pelegri@Eng.Sun.COM>
- To: David Megginson <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:58:35 -0700
I agree with Dave Brownell about the distribution issues.
The only advantage I see for having a language-neutral SAX is having a
parser, say written in C, called from a client written, say in Java,
all in the same machine (and probably the same process).
There are not that many pairs of interest (to me, I'm a Java
programmer), so I'd *much rather* put the burden on the implementor of
the parser, or of the translation layer, than on the client.
I.e. I'd *much rather* have a SAX/Java that mix best with Java than
a language-neutral SAX.
Of course, it depends on what your goals are.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)