Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: len bullard <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 03:38:01 -0500
Jon Bosak wrote:
> SGML gives you the option of using empty end tags, and the
> historical fact is that most large users, given this option and a
> sufficient amount of experience with it, choose not to use it.
Jon is right. I found it easier to read when the SGML instances
were large and the designer used a lot of content types in deeper
hierachies than one gets used to with HTML. For DTDs like the
MIL Content Data Model, or the IADS DTDs where the indexes are
named types mapped to stylesheet tables, one often wants to
reach in and grab pieces of the tree easily. a good editor
helps, but a lot of people won't have what they really need
unless some serious price reductions happen in that market.
Moving elements with highlighting
is easier with the endtags, ihmo,
too, because when one hits the end of a
deep branch, a lot of grouped
short end tags are hard to count by eye.
sgml: people always say no one will edit it
by hand, and almost everyone does.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)