[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:14:37 -0400
At 09:42 AM 5/30/98, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
[...]
>greetings.xsc
><!DOCTYPE xschema SYSTEM xschema.dtd [
><!ENTITY greetings.content "#PCDATA">
>]>
><xschema>
> <ElementType id="greetings">
> <Content>
> <Seq repeatable="no" optional="no">&greetings.content;</Seq>
> </Content>
> </ElementType>
></xschema>
Question: I'd understood XSchema to be an attempt to eliminate the need to
do *any* DTD coding. If that's the case, why define general entities using
the DTD form? Wouldn't some thing like this work?:
<!DOCTYPE xschema SYSTEM xschema.dtd>
<xschema>
<Entities>
<EntityType id="greetings.content" repltext="#PCDATA"/>
</Entities>
<ElementType id="greetings">
<Content>
<Seq repeatable="no" optional="no">&greetings.content;</Seq>
</Content>
</ElementType>
</xschema>
That is, why not abstract entity declarations into XSchema form as well as
the element declarations?
John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor,
simpson@polaris.net | but it might as well be.
| -- "Kin" Hubbard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|