[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- To: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>,"Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 14:39:27
At 09:14 30/05/98 -0400, John E. Simpson wrote:
>
>Question: I'd understood XSchema to be an attempt to eliminate the need to
>do *any* DTD coding. If that's the case, why define general entities using
>the DTD form? Wouldn't some thing like this work?:
>
><!DOCTYPE xschema SYSTEM xschema.dtd>
><xschema>
> <Entities>
> <EntityType id="greetings.content" repltext="#PCDATA"/>
> </Entities>
> <ElementType id="greetings">
> <Content>
> <Seq repeatable="no" optional="no">&greetings.content;</Seq>
> </Content>
> </ElementType>
></xschema>
>
>That is, why not abstract entity declarations into XSchema form as well as
>the element declarations?
I expect that this is one of the questions that Simon will be asking :-) I
think when I started I had assumed that we might wish to argue for your
example. It might then get translated automatically into:
<!ENTITY greetings.content "#PCDATA">
<!ELEMENT greetings (&greetings.content)>
Whereupon the parser takes over. I had simply suggested that the parser
could operate at an earlier stage. I expect that Simon will guide us
through this :-) and I would expect a question like:
"Do we wish to define entities in an XSchema?"
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|