[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 19:28:28 +1000
Michael Kay wrote:
> I would certainly like to be able to declare in a DTD that
> certain elements are valid roots and others are not.
> Assuming there is technology to validate a document against
> an XSchema, it moves one more validity check out of my
> application and into the schema.
>
> In the DTDs I have written, very few of the element types
> (often just one) are valid roots, so my own choice of
> default would be INVALID.
Not me - conversion work of legacy data routinely involves pulling documents to
pieces, working on a fragment (such as a table) then putting it all back
together. A language such as OmniMark will allow you to find fragments without
parsing the data around it - under those circumstances, what is proposed is
unduly restrictive.
--
Regards
Marcus Carr email: mrc@allette.com.au
_______________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia) email: info@allette.com.au
Level 10, 91 York Street www: http://www.allette.com.au
Sydney 2000 NSW Australia phone: +61 2 9262 4777
fax: +61 2 9262 4774
_______________________________________________________________
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
