[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 16:36:33 +0200
> Big question: Do we give these elements [content model elements] id attributes
> as well? It seems like
> overkill to me, but I can imagine cases where it might be worth it.
I say yes -- it's the equivalent of using a parameter entity to define a content
model.
One can imagine an XSchema where the top-level element declarations themselves
are relatively useless but exist so that an XLink can refer to their content
models. This is a bit hacky, but it's the only way I can see to duplicate the
horiz.model and vert.model entities in John Cowan's Itsy B
Bitsy Teeny Weeny Simple Hypertext DTD.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
