xml-dev - Re: XSchema: unparsed entities

[John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>]

Ron Bourret scripsit:

> One other difference I'd like to point out is that, with the exception of the
> "escape character" entities (lt, gt, amp, quot, and apos), I don't think you can
> construct an XML file with parsed entities that you cannot construct without
> them.

Actually, they too can be "compiled out" by clever use of character
references:  see the table in clause 4.6 of XML 1.0.

> This is not true of unparsed entities.  Not only would an UnparsedEntity
> element rectify this problem, it would also solve the validation problem pointed
> out by John Cowan with respect to ENTITY attributes: we can't validate their
> value without unparsed entity declarations.

Okay, I'm convinced.  (Note also that SAX supports them.)

How about:

<!ELEMENT UnparsedEntityDef>
<!ATTLIST UnparsedEntityDef
	Name CDATA #REQUIRED
	SystemLiteral CDATA #REQUIRED
	PubidLiteral CDATA #IMPLIED
	Notation CDATA #REQUIRED>

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)