Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- To: Charles Frankston <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 10:20:02 +0000
Charles Frankston wrote:
> Mr. Anderson --
> To answer the first of your many questions:
> Yes, a syntax virtually identical to yours, that allowed multiple namespace
> declarations in a single attribute was considered. The resulting syntactic
> problems swayed the WG away from that approach. (Some of the issues -- you
> now need an internal quoting mechanism, or a careful proscription on the
> legal characters in a URI, in order to allow proper separation of the pairs.
> It gets even messier to come up with a syntax to declare the default
xml is already sufficiently baroque, that i can only presume that this was not
the deciding argument. :)
> I couldn't understand most of the rest of your questions.
i surmise (from the timestamp on your message) that you are actually refering
here to my other posting re dtd encoding...
if the questions were not understandable, then i must have misunderstood
something basic about the draft's intentions. let my try again by simply
posing the open question:
could someone please post a "complete document" (that is including a dtd) for
the third example in section 5 of the draft (the one with the root element "bk:book")?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)